Effect of pollinator size on seed set in Lamium album var. barbatum
cover image of Plant Ecology and Evolution 154(2)


pollination mutualism
pollinator mediated selection

How to Cite

Hattori, M., Tamada, Y. and Itino, T. (2021) “Effect of pollinator size on seed set in Lamium album var. barbatum”, Plant Ecology and Evolution, 154(2), pp. 201-206. doi: 10.5091/plecevo.2021.1642.


Background and aims – Previous researchers have demonstrated that geographic variation in pollinator community composition can generate diversity in the floral traits of animal-pollinated plants. Our study focused on the bumblebee-pollinated white dead-nettle Lamium album var. barbatum. Geographic variation in corolla length of this species is known to be correlated with regional pollinator size. The aim of this study is to clarify whether size-matching between flower and pollinator affects seed set in L. album.
Material and methods – In the present study, we investigated two L. album populations on Mount Norikura, central Japan. We determined the pollinator community composition and corolla length during the flowering period of L. album and recorded seed set after a single visit by different pollinator categories.
Key results – We observed that the main pollinators of L. album were bumblebee queens and workers. Bumblebee queens visited flowers more frequently than workers during peak flowering. Furthermore, size-matching between flowers and bumblebee queens, but not workers, strongly promoted seed set. These results suggest that L. album flower size is adapted to bumblebee queens, the main pollinator during peak flowering season in our study sites.



Bates D., Mächler M., Bolker B.M. & Walker S.C. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1): 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Burd M., Ashman T.L., Campbell D.R., et al. 2009. Ovule number per flower in a world of unpredictable pollination. American Journal of Botany 96: 1159–1167. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0800183

Charlesworth D. & Charlesworth B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 237–268. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.001321

Diggle P.K. 1995. Architectural effects and the interpretation of patterns of fruit and seed development. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26: 531–552. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.002531

Harder L.D. & Barrett S.C.H. 1995. Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature 373: 512–515. https://doi.org/10.1038/373512a0

Hattori M., Nagano Y. & Itino T. 2015. Geographic variation in flower size and flower-visitor composition of two bumblebee-pollinated, spring-flowering herbs, Lamium album L. var. barbatum (Lamiaceae) and Meehania urticifolia (Lamiaceae). American Journal of Plant Sciences 6: 737–745. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2015.65079

Hattori M., Nagano Y., Shinohara Y. & Itino T. 2016. Pattern of flower size variation along an altitudinal gradient differs between Impatiens textori and Impatiens noli-tangere. Journal of Plant Interactions 11: 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2016.1226437

Hayashi Y. 2009. Nihon-no Yasou. Yama to Keikoku Sha, Tokyo.

Johnson S.D. 2006. Pollinator-driven speciation in plants. In: Harder L.D. & Barrett S.C.H. (eds) Ecology and evolution of flowers: 295–310. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Karron J.D. & Mitchell R.J. 2012. Effects of floral display size on male and female reproductive success in Mimulus ringens. Annals of Botany 109: 563–570. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr193

Kudo G., Hirao A.S. & Kawai Y. 2011. Pollination efficacy of bumblebee queens and workers in the alpine shrub Rhododendron aureum. International Journal of Plant Sciences 172: 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1086/657282

Kuriya S., Hattori. M., Nagano. Y. & Itino N. 2015. Altitudinal flower size variation correlates with local pollinator size in a bumblebee-pollinated herb, Prunella vulgaris L. (Lamiaceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 28: 1761–1769. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12693

Nagano Y., Abe K., Kitazawa T., Hattori M., Hirao S.A. & Itino T. 2014. Changes in pollinator fauna affect altitudinal variation in floral size in a bumblebee-pollinated herb. Ecology and Evolution 4: 3395–3407. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1191

Newman E., Manning J. & Anderson B. 2015. Local adaptation: mechanical fit between floral ecotypes of Nerine humilis (Amaryllidaceae) and pollinator communities. Evolution 69: 2262–2275. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12736

Oberrath R. & Böhning-Gaese K. 2002. Phenological adaptation of ant-dispersed plants to seasonal variation in ant activity. Ecology 83: 1412–1420. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1412:PAOADP]2.0.CO;2

R Development Core Team 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from https://www.r-project.org/ [accessed 8 Apr. 2021].

Stebbins G.L. 1970. Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms I: pollination mechanisms. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.01.110170.001515

Strauss S.Y. & Whittall J.B. 2006. Non-pollinator agents of selection on floral traits. In: Harder L.D. & Barrett S.C.H. (eds) Ecology and evolution of flowers: 120–138. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Sun M., Gross K. & Schiestl F.P. 2014. Floral adaptation to local pollinator guilds in a terrestrial orchid. Annals of Botany 113: 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct219

Van der Niet T., Peakall R. & Johnson S.D. 2014. Pollinator-driven ecological speciation in plants: new evidence and future perspectives. Annals of Botany 113: 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct290

Wessinger C.A. & Hileman L.C. 2016. Accessibility, constraint, and repetition in adaptive floral evolution. Developmental Biology 419: 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.05.003

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.